Drop-off reporthttps://bettertech.tech · 2026-08-09 20:59:34 · agency · goal: start a project by contacting the studio about custom software work
Fix first, then spend1 persona(s) WANTED to convert but were blocked by friction. Those are visitors your ads would have paid for and your site would have lost. Clear the blockers in the plan below first.
The site is fast, well-written, and the HOW WE WORK / FAQ sections genuinely earn trust — one high-intent founder said he was ready to book an intro call. Then he hit a wall: the only way to contact Better Tech is to create a password-protected account in a client portal, with no email, phone, calendar link, or simple inquiry form anywhere on the site. That single gate is almost certainly killing the majority of would-be inquiries, so buying ads today means paying for traffic that has nowhere to convert. Secondary issues — no pricing signal, no named team, no location, no client-scale proof — lose the price-sensitive and vendor-vetting segments once the contact wall is fixed.
Estimates weight each persona's outcome by its intent level and realistic share of ad traffic, blended with UX-research baselines and the automated audit — directional, not measurements. Landing load: 410ms.
Visitor hit the turn limit before reaching the goal.
funded-startup-founder-scoping-mvp
medium intent · 15% of traffic · desktop
blocked
I liked what I read: HOW WE WORK (Scope → Build → Ship → Support) directly answered my complaint about the last agency ("scoped tight, built fast, shipped working"), the FAQ confirmed I'd own the full
junior-dev-language-tourist
low intent · 24% of traffic · mobile
ran out of patience
Visitor hit the turn limit before reaching the goal.
cheap-website-shopper
low intent · 26% of traffic · mobile
ran out of patience
Visitor hit the turn limit before reaching the goal.
enterprise-eng-manager-vendor-vetting
medium intent · 13% of traffic · desktop
not convinced
Went straight to ABOUT looking for headcount, LLC/entity confirmation, and a Seattle address, then checked WORK for scale and security/handoff/documentation signals. ABOUT confirms 'Better Tech LLC' b
Where visitors drop off
highThe only way to contact the studio is to create a full account with a password, so ready-to-inquire prospects abandon instead of sending a first message.
https://bettertech.tech/contact · stage: convert · funded-startup-founder-scoping-mvp was 'ready to reach out for an intro call and a rough ballpark' and stopped dead at the account-creation wall; crawl data confirms 0 forms on every page crawled and no contact email/phone anywhere.
highNo pricing signal, packages, or minimum engagement size, so visitors can't self-qualify and assume clicking 'Start a Project' means a long sales process.
https://bettertech.tech/services · stage: engage · cheap-website-shopper (26% of traffic) explicitly refused to click Start a Project because the cost FAQ only says 'scoped and quoted individually'; the same founder wanted 'a rough ballpark' before reaching out.
mediumMessaging leads with the studio's own language/OS side projects, which reads as either too enterprise for small buyers or too hobbyist for large ones — nobody sees themselves in it.
https://bettertech.tech/ · stage: explore · cheap-website-shopper found it 'enterprise-level custom software, not something for a small salon/food-truck site'; enterprise-eng-manager read the same copy as 'side projects rather than client-scale delivery'.
mediumNo named people, headcount, or office location makes vetting buyers conclude it's a one-person shop and close the tab.
https://bettertech.tech/about · stage: explore · enterprise-eng-manager-vendor-vetting (13%) exited 'too small' after About confirmed only 'Better Tech LLC' with no Seattle address, names, or team size.
mediumCase studies are thin and small-scale with no client names, outcomes, security, or handoff detail, so credibility never reaches the level needed to inquire.
https://bettertech.tech/work · stage: explore · enterprise-eng-manager noted 'no enterprise-scale case studies, no client logos, and nothing about security practices, compliance, or handoff/documentation process'.
medium14 of 20 tap targets are under 40px, so phone visitors mis-tap navigation and CTAs and give up navigating.
https://bettertech.tech · stage: land · Automated mobile-tap-targets check, medium severity, on the homepage.
lowThin site-wide navigation (7 links per page) gives low-intent visitors no clear next step, and three of five personas simply wandered without reaching a conversion path.
https://bettertech.tech/ · stage: explore · smb-owner-needs-internal-tool, junior-dev-language-tourist, and cheap-website-shopper all 'ran_out_of_patience' before reaching the goal.
Improvement plan
Put a real contact form and email address on /contactReplace the account-creation gate with a 4-field form (name, email, what you're building, budget range) that posts straight to your inbox, and print a plain mailto: address plus a Cal.com/Calendly 'Book a 20-min intro call' link right above it. Keep the client portal login as a small secondary link labelled 'Existing client? Sign in'. This single change unblocks the highest-intent persona on the panel and is the only thing standing between paid traffic and a lead. (nil)
Add contact details to the site footer and header CTAPut the email address, Seattle location, and 'Book a call' link in the footer on every page so no one has to reach /contact to convert. Make the header 'Start a Project' button point to the new form, not the portal signup. Quick to ship and captures visitors who decide mid-page. (nil)
Publish price ranges and a minimum engagementAdd three indicative tiers on /services (e.g. 'Small internal tool — from $8k / 3–4 weeks', 'MVP — $25k–$60k', 'Ongoing product team — monthly retainer from $X') and state your project minimum plainly. This lets the 26% price-shopper segment disqualify themselves instead of bouncing, and gives serious founders the ballpark they said they needed before inquiring. (nil)
Fix mobile tap targetsRaise all nav links, footer links, and CTA buttons to a minimum 44x44px hit area with adequate spacing — mostly padding and line-height changes. 14 of 20 targets currently fail, which taxes every mobile ad click before the visitor even reads the pitch. (nil)
Put real humans and a real address on /aboutAdd founder name(s), photos, years of experience, team size (even 'a two-person studio' beats silence), and the Seattle, WA address with entity name. Vetting buyers screen out anonymous sites by default; being explicitly small and named converts better than being vague. Link LinkedIn/GitHub profiles as third-party proof. (nil)
Rewrite case studies around client outcomesFor each project on /work, add the client type, the problem, what you shipped, timeline, and one measurable result or client quote; move the language/OS side projects into a separate 'Lab' or R&D section so they read as credibility, not as your main business. Add a short 'How we hand off' block covering documentation, repo ownership, and security practices. (nil)
Reframe homepage headline around a buyer problemLead with who you help and what they get ('Custom internal tools and MVPs for small teams — scoped in a week, shipped in six') instead of first-principles/language-building. Add two segment paths below the fold ('I need an internal tool' / 'I need an MVP') so both small-business and startup visitors immediately see themselves and click through. (nil)
Add lightweight social proof above the contact CTAPlace 2–3 short client testimonials with names and companies, plus any logos you're permitted to show, directly above the new contact form and on /services. This is the cheapest counter to the 'one person with a nice site' read that ended the enterprise session. (nil)
16. [click] the second CREATE ACCOUNT button (form submit)
17. [click] button that says CREATE ACCOUNT below the password field
funded-startup-founder-scoping-mvp
1. [visit] https://bettertech.tech
2. [look] https://bettertech.tech/
3. [visit] https://bettertech.tech/about
4. [visit] https://bettertech.tech/services
5. [look] https://bettertech.tech/services
6. [click] "Who owns the code?" FAQ item
7. [click] Who owns the code?
8. [look] https://bettertech.tech/services
9. [look] https://bettertech.tech/services
10. [visit] https://bettertech.tech/contact
11. [click] CREATE ACCOUNT
12. [look] https://bettertech.tech/contact
13. [friction] There is no email address, phone number, or simple "tell us about your project" form anywhere on the site. The only way to contact the studio is to create a full account (name, email, password) in their client portal just to send a first message. As a prospect comparing a few dev shops, I'm not willing to create a password-protected account with a company before I've even had an intro call or gotten a ballpark price. This is a much higher-friction ask than a normal contact form or 'book a call' link, and it's enough to make me leave without inquiring.
14. [finish] blocked
junior-dev-language-tourist
1. [visit] https://bettertech.tech
2. [look] https://bettertech.tech/
3. [click] G-SCRIPT
4. [look] https://bettertech.tech/
5. [click] WORK
6. [look] https://bettertech.tech/work
7. [click] "READ THE STORY →" link under "WE BUILT A LANGUAGE. THEN WE RAN OUR COMPANY ON IT."
7. [friction] Looking for a simple price range or package (like "5 page website starting at $X") before contacting anyone. The FAQ "What does a project cost?" just says every project is scoped and quoted individually after a conversation — no ballpark number, no packages. The whole site talks about building their own programming language and OS, which feels like enterprise-level custom software, not something for a small salon/food-truck site. This reads like it'll turn into a long sales conversation, so I'm not comfortable clicking "Start a Project."
enterprise-eng-manager-vendor-vetting
1. [visit] https://bettertech.tech
2. [look] https://bettertech.tech/
3. [visit] https://bettertech.tech/about
4. [look] https://bettertech.tech/about
5. [visit] https://bettertech.tech/work
6. [friction] As a procurement-minded visitor, I needed basic facts on ABOUT: team headcount, entity/address details (found via 'Seattle software consultancies' search, but no Seattle address or location is mentioned anywhere), and any security/compliance or handoff documentation specifics. The About page only has vague 'we' language, a story about building their own programming language/OS/apps, and generic 'how we work' bullets — no names, no team size, no office location, no security or compliance mentions. The WORK page confirms small-scale projects only (a booking site, a chore app, a spa website, a few in-development side products) — nothing at the scale my company would need, and no client logos or enterprise references. This reads like a very small (likely 1-2 person) shop dressed up with confident copy, which is exactly the 'one person with a nice site' pattern I was screening for.